CLEM Model Continued – The YouTube Model and an example in the school context

Standard

So far I have looked at the existing online Communities and Literature around my selected learning activity – to learn a new Irish tune by ear. Exploration of these aspects of the CLEM model has helped to explain why “watching” YouTube videos assisted me with learning a new tune. This post will look at the remaining components of the CLEM ModelExample and Model in relation to my learning task and how this has helped to explain the benefits of “creating” my own learning video to share with others.

  1. Example & 4. Model

The Model (type of ICT) that I have chosen to use for my learning activity is YouTube. This model enables learners to view other people’s videos and also create their own Channel (an online space) where they share and organise their own videos. In regards to the technical aspects of this Model – I found it quite easy to create a my own YouTube Channel (you can view it here) however found it a little more challenging to personalise the Channel to meet my needs and organise my videos – although I am confident I will work it out with time, I’m sure it just takes a bit of practice. I did not come across any serious technical issues which prevented me from using this platform – no doubt this is part of the reason it is currently the most popular online video sharing platform on the web (Buzzetto-More, 2014).

To help me better understand how this Model could be used in learning, M Quennerstedt’s article “PE on YouTube – investigating participation in physical education practice” provided a useful Example. The article showed that effective learning (in the school context) can occur through social media and that YouTube is a useful platform as it caters to the range of learning styles and preferences and allows for diversity in participating in learning (e.g. flexibility in watching, selecting, creating and presenting videos). Quennerstedt also looked at how students and teachers shape content (i.e. making public how they learn or how they create resources) and demonstrated how this can reveal new aspects of learning that may not otherwise be apparent – something that is beneficial for not only students, but also teachers and researchers. The article also discussed the benefit of YouTube as a tool for archiving learning activities and resources to enable them to be accessed and used by a wide audience not just in the present but well into the future.

In the article, Quennerstedt also outlines some of the technical and ethical issues for teachers using this platform platform for learning E.g. The difficulties with protecting the the privacy of students and their work on this public forum. It was recommended that teachers do not download their students’ videos to their home computer, so that it remains the student’s decision when they would like to remove their work from the public domain. This is something I will need to keep in mind in my role as a teacher and is also something for me to consider as a student of the NGL course – the permanency of the material I post on the web while participating in online communities.

References

Quennerstedt, M. (2013). PE on YouTube – investigating participation in physical education practice. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18(1), 42-59.

Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2014). An Examination of Undergraduate Student’s Perceptions and Predilections of the Use of YouTube in the Teaching and Learning Process. Interdisciplinary Journal Of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 1017-32.